In an opinion released yesterday by the Minnesota Court of Appeals, a very interesting procedural issue was addressed.
A prominent Minneapolis law firm brought a motion to dismiss a complaint against its client based on a claimed lack of merit. In so doing, the firm stated in its motion papers that it was, on its client's behalf, reserving the right to require arbitration. The contract at issue included a mandatory arbitration clause for disputes.
The motion failed, as would be expected. Later then, the firm brought a motion to compel arbitration. That is, the motion was to close the district court case and require the dispute to be arbitrated. Despite the prior effort to reserve the right to require arbitration, the district court held, and the court of appeals affirmed, that by bringing the motion to dismiss that moving party, through its lawyers, had waived the right to arbitration.
If you are in Washington, Ramsey, Hennepin, or Chisago counties, call me to assess your litigation and whether district court is a better option than arbitration. You don't want to make the mistake made above.
The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney. Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney. All information contained in links are the property of the linked site.