---
title: US Supreme Court Clarifies Accommodation Requirements for Employers
description: accomidation religion requirement clarified
image: https://www.gallatin-law.com/hubfs/Canva%20images/Canva%20Design%20DAFnOFDQ6AI.png
---
[Dan's Desk](https://www.gallatin-law.com/blog/author/dan-gallatin)
- [lawyer](https://www.gallatin-law.com/blog/tag/lawyer)
- [hugo](https://www.gallatin-law.com/blog/tag/hugo)
- [MN](https://www.gallatin-law.com/blog/tag/mn)
- [law](https://www.gallatin-law.com/blog/tag/law)
- [attorney](https://www.gallatin-law.com/blog/tag/attorney)
- [legal](https://www.gallatin-law.com/blog/tag/legal)
[Subscribe](https://www.gallatin-law.com/blog/us-supreme-court-clarifies-accommodation-requirements-for-employers#)
06/29/2023
# US Supreme Court Clarifies Accommodation Requirements for Employers
-
-
-
-
- [mailto:?subject=US%20Supreme%20Court%20Clarifies%20Accommodation%20Requirements%20for%20Employers&body=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gallatin-law.com%2Fblog%2Fus-supreme-court-clarifies-accommodation-requirements-for-employers](mailto:?subject=US%20Supreme%20Court%20Clarifies%20Accommodation%20Requirements%20for%20Employers&body=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gallatin-law.com%2Fblog%2Fus-supreme-court-clarifies-accommodation-requirements-for-employers)
Over 50 years ago the United States Supreme Court issued the *Hardison* opinion. In that opinion the Court addressed what accommodations must an employer provide to employees for things such as religious beliefs. *Harden* included a test of sorts that employers must show an undue hardship on its operations in order to be exempt from providing the accommodation requested.
*Hardin* was clarified today. The background, briefly, was a postal worker refused to work on Sunday to observe the Sabbath. He switched offices to be at stations which did not have Sunday deliveries. Ultimately, due to the increase in private shipping packages through the USPS, he was expected to work Sundays.
It remains the case that the lens of the assessment is the impact on the employer's business. But what used to be a *de minimis* threshold is now clarified to mean that forcing other employees to work more to accommodate a religious belief is not enough to carve the employer out of its requirement to accommodate the employee.
The standard is now clarified to be that the employer must show a substantial burden on its overall business operations. The Court does not, and could not, state what that means as every business is different. Substantial burden can come in the form of increased costs.
So, not a bright line test. But it is imperative for employers to keep abreast of these progressions. The workforce diversity will only increase. Knowing the law is necessary to keep pace with who you send paychecks to.
- [supreme court](https://www.gallatin-law.com/blog/tag/supreme-court)
## [Dan Gallatin](https://www.gallatin-law.com/blog/author/dan-gallatin)
Dan is a lifelong resident of Minnesota. Born in St. Paul, Dan spent many of his formative years growing up there before moving to White Bear Lake. After graduating from White Bear Lake, Dan spent four glorious years at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, earning a degree in two majors. Dan worked as a Senior Investigator at the Minnesota Department of Commerce for several years after graduating from college. During his final years Dan attended William Mitchell College of Law while still working full-time. During this exhausting 3 ½ year period Dan honed his skills in becoming an efficient, to-the-point legal practitioner. While at Madison Dan met his wife, Tonya, and together they moved to Minnesota to plant their roots. Dan and Tonya have two amazing, unique children and reside in Hugo.
### CONNECT WITH ME
-
## Related Posts
[
09/22/2021 Sanctioning a Residential Building Contractor: Evidentiary Standards The Department of Labor & Industry regulates Minnesota's residential building contractors. It is staffed with investigators who seem to have a hint…
Read Post
](https://www.gallatin-law.com/blog/sanctioning-a-residential-building-contractor-evidentiary-standards)
[10/14/2020 Recent Regulatory Actions by the Minnesota Department of Commerce It has been a while since I checked on the erratic and heavy-handed Department of Commerce, but this week I took a peek at the recent regulatory…
Read Post
](https://www.gallatin-law.com/blog/recent-regulatory-actions-by-the-minnesota-department-of-commerce)
### Subscribe Here!
```json
{
"@context" : "https://schema.org",
"@type" : "BlogPosting",
"author" : {
"@type" : "Person",
"name" : "Dan Gallatin",
"url" : "https://www.gallatin-law.com/blog/author/dan-gallatin"
},
"dateModified" : "2023-06-29T16:58:12.813Z",
"datePublished" : "2023-06-29T16:58:12.000Z",
"headline" : "US Supreme Court Clarifies Accommodation Requirements for Employers",
"image" : [ "https://www.gallatin-law.com/hubfs/Canva%20images/Canva%20Design%20DAFnOFDQ6AI.png" ],
"mainEntityOfPage" : {
"@id" : "https://www.gallatin-law.com/blog/us-supreme-court-clarifies-accommodation-requirements-for-employers",
"@type" : "WebPage"
},
"publisher" : {
"@type" : "Organization",
"logo" : {
"@type" : "ImageObject",
"url" : "https://www.gallatin-law.com/hubfs/logos/Gallatin-Logo-654x84.png"
},
"name" : "Gallatin Law, PLLC"
}
}
```